Connect with us

Latest News

Trump to ask Congress to approve Saudi Arabia nuclear energy accord

Published

on

The Trump administration wants to propose to Congress a contract with Saudi Arabia to share nuclear power technology that does not include protections the United States has long said would avoid materials being used in nuclear weapons projects, two sources told Reuters.

The administration will send to Congress within days a document known as a 123 Agreement to be signed by U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi energy minister Abdulaziz bin Salman, the sources said.

The two reached a preliminary deal in Riyadh last year.

The White House and the U.S. Department of Energy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The deal cites Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and is needed to allow the U.S. government and American firms to engage with businesses in the kingdom to build a multibillion-dollar civil nuclear industry.

Sources familiar with the deal say it does not include the “Gold Standard” that would prevent the monarchy from enriching uranium and reprocessing used nuclear fuel, both potential avenues to nuclear weapons.

The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues, said the deal also excludes the “Additional Protocol” which gives the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency wide and more intrusive oversight of a country’s nuclear activities, including the power to conduct snap inspections at undeclared sites.

The administration would submit the agreement as soon as Wednesday, one of the individuals said. The other suggested the agreement will be submitted in a week or so. One of them, who did not say whether the agreement was without safeguards, said it would be presented shortly.

Wright had stated the preliminary deal was not about enrichment, and it included all the nonproliferation provisions in the Atomic Energy Act, which are among the highest in the world.

The agreement would create a legal framework for working together on the nuclear fuel cycle, including uranium enrichment, without the need for the United States to share any of its related capabilities or technology with Saudi Arabia, according to one of the sources.

FEARS OF PROLIFERATION

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman stated long before Iran’s announcement Saudi Arabia would create a nuclear weapon if Iran did, raising concerns among arms control activists and some U.S. politicians about a civil nuclear deal.

Saudi Arabia doesn’t intend to acquire any nuclear bomb but without a doubt if Iran created a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as quickly as possible,” the crown prince told CBS in 2018.

The kingdom has also said it wants to keep the right to enrich uranium.

The United Arab Emirates signed a 123 Agreement in 2009 with Washington and agreed to the “Gold Standard.”

When 123 agreements are sent to Congress, they go through a review period of roughly 90 ⁠days of ​consecutive congressional sessions for lawmakers to object, or they become effective.

Congress would have to pass a joint resolution and have a two-thirds majority to override any presidential veto to block ​the agreement.

Many Democrats and some Republicans, including President Donald Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio when he was in the Senate, have insisted any deal contain guardrails.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

CM Murad: The opposition lacks the courage to press forward with a resolution on Sindh’s separation

Published

on

By

  • Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah has claimed that PPP will never allow the split of Sindh and the province will remain unified and undivided. He added that the opposition has no courage to table a resolution in Sindh Assembly for the partition of Sindh.

Murad Ali Shah was addressing the provincial assembly. “Sindh is one and will remain one,” he declared. “Until we are alive, we will not allow Sindh to be divided,”

The Sindh CM indicated that the place of discussion is Sindh Assembly. “This house is going to make a decision that will shut the mouths of everyone,” he said.

Murad Ali Shah, while talking to the media, stated that the Opposition does not have the courage to bring a resolution for the split of Sindh and the country runs by the Constitution and public representatives would decide.

“Our decision has been taken earlier and will be taken in future,” Sindh CM stated.

Continue Reading

Latest News

IHC directs jail authorities not to put Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi in solitary confinement

Published

on

By

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has restrained jail authorities from putting Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi in solitary confinement.

Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro of the Islamabad High Court disposed of petitions contesting the claimed solitary confinement of the two detainees and issued a series of directives to the Adiala Jail officials.

The petitions have been filed by Aleema Khan on behalf of Imran Khan and Musharrafa Khawar Maneka against the purported isolation of PTI founder and Bushra Bibi.

The court in its order directed the superintendent of Adiala Jail to ensure that Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi are not put in solitary confinement. The authorities were also ordered to arrange a meeting between Bushra Bibi and Imran Khan.

The court ruled that Imran Khan be permitted to meet his family in compliance with prison rules and be allowed to talk to his boys on the phone.

The IHC also ordered the jail officials to distribute newspapers and books daily to Imran Khan.

The ruling also said that his audio recordings might be provided with safeguards, and that the facility could be withdrawn if the recordings were exploited.

The court ordered authorities to provide Imran Khan with medical amenities according to jail rules.

The IHC deemed the petitions admissible on the grounds laid down in the Nusrat Bhutto case and Begum Shamim Afridi case.

Continue Reading

Latest News

AJK parties conduct peace march against violence

Published

on

By

 All political and religious parties and trade unions on Monday held a march for establishing peace and rejecting violence in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK).

The peace march was organised jointly by all political and religious parties and people from all walks of life under People’s Alliance Forum Sudhanuti in Palandri.

A large number of representatives of political parties, businessmen, civil society, lawyers, transporters, students, ex-servicemen, and citizens participated in the rally.

The peace march began from Kotli Chowk and passed through various routes of the city to reach Kachari Chowk.

The participants chanted slogans, “This homeland is ours, we are its guardians, Anarchy is unacceptable in Azad Kashmir, Corruption is unacceptable, “Unrest is unacceptable, Kashmir and Pakistan are one, and What we want is peace.”

Representatives of various political and social organisations, PML-N, PPP, Muslim Conference, JUIF, Jammu and Kashmir People’s Party, Utsaq Pakistan Party, Tehreek-e-Insaf, traders, civil society, lawyers, transporters, educational circles, and ex-servicemen, addressed the public meeting.

Speakers and participants expressed their commitment to peace, stability, and the protection of public rights in the region.

A joint statement issued by the participants of the march congratulated the Government of Pakistan and the Armed Forces of Pakistan for playing the role of mediator for world peace.

The declaration said that no one can weaken the eternal relationship between Azad Kashmir and Pakistan. A strong and stable Pakistan is the guarantee of the success of the Kashmir freedom movement, while Azad Kashmir is a defensive stronghold of Pakistan, therefore, unrest in the region cannot be allowed to spread.

The joint statement called on the Government of Pakistan and the Government of Azad Kashmir to hold immediate elections in seven constituencies of Rawalakot and Sidhanoti.

The speakers said that along with ensuring the unhindered delivery of food and other essential goods from Pakistan to Azad Kashmir, there was also a demand for the immediate removal of the blockades and obstacles imposed at entry points within the borders of Azad Kashmir and Pakistan.

Participants called for the restoration of travel and education rights in Azad Kashmir, especially in Sidhnoti and Rawalakot, and for the immediate restoration of internet service in the state.

They also demanded that the process of issuing required documents for citizens going abroad be simplified and expedited, that wheat be ensured for flour mills in Azad Kashmir, and that flour supply be maintained.

The participants expressed concern over reports of the relocation of educational and administrative institutions from Rawalakot. 

Continue Reading

Trending