Latest News
LHC rules arrests on only supplemental statements illegal
The Lahore High Court (LHC) has ruled that arresting a person solely on the basis of a supplementary statement is illegal, holding that suspicion, verbal information or a delayed supplementary statement cannot serve as lawful grounds for arrest.
Justice Muhammad Tariq Nadeem issued the ruling while granting post-arrest bail to accused Umar Farooq alias Ehtesham in a murder case. The court also released an 11-page detailed judgment, which will serve as a judicial precedent in similar cases.
During the hearing, Additional Inspector General (Investigation) Shehzada Sultan and other senior police officials appeared before the court. In response to the court’s queries, the Additional IG acknowledged that criminal law contains no separate legal provision governing supplementary statements. He further admitted that investigating officers sometimes rely on such statements for improper purposes.
In its judgment, the court held that a confession made before the police is not legally admissible as evidence. It further ruled that a supplementary statement or a statement recorded after a delay, without independent and credible evidence, does not meet the legal threshold required to justify an arrest.
During the proceedings, the Additional IG Investigation assured the court that, in the future, no suspect would be arrested solely on the basis of a supplementary statement.
The court directed the Inspector General of Punjab Police to circulate copies of the judgment to all Regional Police Officers (RPOs), Capital City Police Officers (CCPOs) and District Police Officers (DPOs) across the province to ensure effective implementation of the ruling.
The Lahore High Court also instructed the Punjab IGP to conduct a strict legal review of arrests made on the basis of supplementary statements and submit a compliance report to the court within two weeks.
The judgment establishes the legal principle that, following the registration of an FIR, a supplementary or additional statement alone, without independent and compelling evidence, cannot constitute lawful grounds for arrest. The court observed that such a practice violates the principles of fair investigation and the protection of fundamental rights.
Latest News
Anmol Pinky reveals drug trafficking network during investigation
Alleged drug baroness Anmol alias Pinky in investigation confessed to running drug trafficking networkThe Karachi Police have filed a supplemental challan in the court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge (South). The hearing was conducted in a drug recovery case registered against Anmol Pinky in 2018.
The additional challan states that Nasir (brother of Anmol Pinky) has already been acquitted in the case. It also said that Anmol Pinky has been on the run since 2018.
She was supposedly caught in interrogation admitting to being the ringleader of a narcotics trafficking network. The charge sheet also named two other suspects Maiser Ali and Ainullah absconders.
Latest News
Tesla launches new balancing bike for kids
Electric vehicle giant Tesla has launched a balance bike for two-to-five-year-olds for the eye-watering price of $225 – more than double the cost of typical ordinary balance bikes.
The bike has no pedals, motor or brakes so kids can push with their feet to propel themselves along. It has a lightweight magnesium frame, contemporary style and a seat adjustable to five different height settings.
Despite its somewhat high price the bike sold out soon after it went on sale. A comparable design of a $30 Tesla T-shirt also sold out fast.
The company stated it will take pre-orders for the next batch July 31 and clients should order early owing to limited availability.
Tesla’s bike is much more costly than most balance bikes on the market, which cost about $100.
Tesla had released the Cyberquad for Kids, but sales were temporarily halted as it failed to fulfill some safety requirements.
Latest News
Trump to ask Congress to approve Saudi Arabia nuclear energy accord
The Trump administration wants to propose to Congress a contract with Saudi Arabia to share nuclear power technology that does not include protections the United States has long said would avoid materials being used in nuclear weapons projects, two sources told Reuters.
The administration will send to Congress within days a document known as a 123 Agreement to be signed by U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi energy minister Abdulaziz bin Salman, the sources said.
The two reached a preliminary deal in Riyadh last year.
The White House and the U.S. Department of Energy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The deal cites Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and is needed to allow the U.S. government and American firms to engage with businesses in the kingdom to build a multibillion-dollar civil nuclear industry.
Sources familiar with the deal say it does not include the “Gold Standard” that would prevent the monarchy from enriching uranium and reprocessing used nuclear fuel, both potential avenues to nuclear weapons.
The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues, said the deal also excludes the “Additional Protocol” which gives the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency wide and more intrusive oversight of a country’s nuclear activities, including the power to conduct snap inspections at undeclared sites.
The administration would submit the agreement as soon as Wednesday, one of the individuals said. The other suggested the agreement will be submitted in a week or so. One of them, who did not say whether the agreement was without safeguards, said it would be presented shortly.
Wright had stated the preliminary deal was not about enrichment, and it included all the nonproliferation provisions in the Atomic Energy Act, which are among the highest in the world.
The agreement would create a legal framework for working together on the nuclear fuel cycle, including uranium enrichment, without the need for the United States to share any of its related capabilities or technology with Saudi Arabia, according to one of the sources.
FEARS OF PROLIFERATION
Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman stated long before Iran’s announcement Saudi Arabia would create a nuclear weapon if Iran did, raising concerns among arms control activists and some U.S. politicians about a civil nuclear deal.
Saudi Arabia doesn’t intend to acquire any nuclear bomb but without a doubt if Iran created a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as quickly as possible,” the crown prince told CBS in 2018.
The kingdom has also said it wants to keep the right to enrich uranium.
The United Arab Emirates signed a 123 Agreement in 2009 with Washington and agreed to the “Gold Standard.”
When 123 agreements are sent to Congress, they go through a review period of roughly 90 days of consecutive congressional sessions for lawmakers to object, or they become effective.
Congress would have to pass a joint resolution and have a two-thirds majority to override any presidential veto to block the agreement.
Many Democrats and some Republicans, including President Donald Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio when he was in the Senate, have insisted any deal contain guardrails.
-
Latest News2 months agoICC board meeting in India: Mohsin Naqvi gets invitation
-
Business2 months agoThe IMF mission has arrived in Pakistan for discussions regarding the budget.
-
Latest News2 months agoTo commemorate the anniversary of Marka-e-Haq, top civic and military leaders assemble at Pakistan Monument.
-
Latest News2 months agoA meta program to monitor mouse clicks made by employees in violation of EU privacy regulations
-
Latest News2 months agoIs the US-Iran standoff exposing deep fault lines in US intelligence coordination?
-
Latest News1 month ago7.8 magnitude quake hits southern Philippines\
-
Business2 months agoOil hits 2-week high following drone strike on UAE nuclear power facility
-
Latest News1 month agoShehbaz, Zardari discuss key issues as PPP hints at budget support
